This week I was at a conference hosted by Stir to Action, all about . The event highlighted a key opportunity: one of the biggest hurdles for small start-ups is affordable premises, and churches often have under-used buildings. In some cases they are struggling to keep them open if membership has declined. In theory then, there ought to be all kinds of mutual benefits to churches opening up to communities and small businesses.
I recently moved into a co-working space along these lines myself, where the local business has installed office space down the side of St Matthew’s Church in Luton.
However, one of the biggest problems with old church buildings is their energy efficiency. They can be almost impossible to heat properly, with cold stone walls and floors. Lofty ceilings mean that warmth rises pointlessly into the empty rafters. To make matters worse, listed buildings can’t be tinkered with. In some cases it might be possible to insulate them, but many historic churches have historical significance and the heritage guidelines insist on ‘minimal intervention’. As things stand, the challenge of heating churches is a real obstacle to sustainability, and a challenge to the Church of England’s plans to .
Of course, one of the main reasons why churches have poor heating is that it’s been added on afterwards. Nobody expected them to be heated 700 or 800 years ago, and you just went to church in your coat. Medieval services were daily, short, and most people would be standing. Pews were only introduced once the Protestants started delivering sermons and the congregation had to settle in for longer. The idea that you should sit comfortably in church is a recent idea, though that won’t cut much ice if you’re trying to get freelancers in to use your co-working space.
One early attempt at heating gives us a potential approach – churches added a boiler, and then ran pipes under the pews. That creates heat locally where it is needed and doesn’t attempt to heat the whole church. Space heating approaches became more common after the Second World War. People were adding central heating at home, expectations for the indoor environment were changing and the church adapted. But in sustainability terms, heating the person rather than the space might be an idea to revisit – as demonstrated by this on the topic.
Underfloor heating can provide more even heat at the low level without losing quite so much of it into the roof, and that’s been a good choice for many churches. Heated pews or small electric heaters are sometimes used. The default for most churches is a boiler and radiators though, which is effective but wasteful.
If space heating is the direction we want to go in, then it would be a good idea to shrink the space that needs to be heated. In the building where the conference was held, in London, the main room had been divided with structural glass. There were a number of benefits to sub-dividing the building this way, but heating is one of them. Underused side chapels or wings can be screened off, reducing the amount of space to heat. Using glass preserves the beauty of the architecture. It may be possible to lower ceilings in some places too.
Some churches have taken a more radical approach, such as , which I’ll go ahead and call building of the week. They have essentially created a new modernist community centre and business hub inside the old church. The historic building can be appreciated in new ways from the walkways and gantries, but the series of smaller spaces is much more manageable.
Of course, in some contexts the right answer might be to sell the building off or even knock it down. It upsets the heritage folks, but there are going to be some historic churches that really can’t be saved.
If you’ve seen something interesting done with a historic church that makes it more sustainable, drop me a note in the comments. I’m sure there are creative solutions for the vast Victorian red brick barn that is currently my office, and I’ll let you know if we come to any conclusions.