conservation

Closing the door on illegal timber

moving rosewood by river

When Madagascar experienced its latest political coup in 2009, one of the consequences was a pause in government operations. Nobody was quite sure who was in charge and in some of the further flung parts of the country, lines of authority broke down. The logging companies were quick to seize the brief window of opportunity, and armed gangs moved into the Marojejy National Park. The park closed to the public, and the official reported helplessly from the sidelines: “Loggers have their run of the park, operating large camps, conducting business openly in broad daylight, threatening villagers and bribing local policemen.”

Calm was eventually restored, but the local ‘rosewood mafia’ and their Chinese export contacts had the run of the park for weeks. The park estimates that over 46,000 rosewood trees were cut down, with a value of over $100 million. Gangs were also able to take back large stockpiles of confiscated wood and ship it abroad. Other national parks were also targeted, and the battle to police the forests continues.

Of course, a trade in illegal wood also needs traders and buyers as well as loggers. Campaigners are working with the Malagasy government, but they have also tried to target the demand side. The French shipping company has been accused of profiting from the trade by shipping illegal timber from Malagasy ports. Much of the wood ends up in China, where it becomes impossible to track. Other shipments head for Europe or America, and one investigation was able to track the illegal wood right through to the a rather high profile end user – Gibson guitars. This summer Gibson were for possessing illegal rosewood.

The US government were able to prosecute Gibson under amendments to the Lacey Act, which gave the US some of the tightest regulations in the world on illegal logging. That measure inspired the coalition government to include a similar bill in its agreement, but then they . With the government failing to deliver, Caroline Lucas of the Green Party introduced the law as a , but it ran out of time in the house. Britain remains the .

In the absence of national regulation, campaigners have worked with and businesses to move independently to verify their wood sources, my local council in Luton being one of them. For us consumers, we’re still best off looking for FSC certification on wood and paper products that we buy, and encouraging our favourite brands to source their wood products responsibly.

There is some progress on the issue however. New EU regulations come into force next year that will clamp down on the sale of illegal wood. This will make it harder to bring it to market, but campaigners say it leaves too many loopholes. Possession won’t be illegal, which means that companies will face no penalties for buying and using illegal timber and therefore have no incentive to improve their sourcing standards. Still, the EU ban is better than nothing. It comes into force in March 2013, so we may see more about illegal timber in the news next year.

Can we hope for more? Not in the current economic climate. Any tighter regulations would be seen as more red tape for business, and that’s unpopular right now. Madagascar’s forests will have to wait.

3 comments

  1. Get Money out of politics

    SWINNEY BIG THREE

    A—Fed fund election—6 months-= 3 primary 3 general—No personal money—

    Outside very very limited—VERY

    B. since no need for campaign funds BAN all government employees accepting anything with a financial value. Present or future promises. This closes K Street Bribery

    100.. Progressive Flat Tax by group—14,00 income and we should be

    paying our way and paying down the debt. We can do it with higher tax rate for top.

    We did it 1945-1980 by Taxing wealth.

    Sad but true today top 50% get 87% + of

    individual income and pay 13.5% tax Rate.

    It took a Tax Rate of 32% on Top 50% to balance our budget. It would require a change from (Top 1% paying 23%); (Top 10% paying 19%); and (top 25% paying 15%). The top 2% own 50% of wealth and took 30% of income.

    Redistribute Wealth and fast.

    HOW— by Flat Tax by group—tax income to pay our way—we have done it before.

    1. Clarenceswinney – Just like tighter logging restrictions, as Jeremy said, would not be very popular, I dare say your suggestions won’t be either, so, how do you suggest we encourage them to happen?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. .