“We are changing the way we live not so that we don’t consume and get the material benefits that people like ourselves actually enjoy, but we are changing it so that we do so in a way that is sustainable.”
Tony Blair, The Climate Group
“I’m convinced that there’s no necessary trade-off between a low-carbon future and more or less transport.”
Lord Adonis, UK Transport Minister
Two quotes in two days from British politicians adamant that at all. I can see why they say it – they are politicians, and they feel they have to ‘sell’ a low carbon future to the public. I agree that telling people the future is going to be bleak unless they give up all their favourite things is no way to motivate them, but there is another way. That other way is to blow the whistle on the endless growth, the consumption and the hypermobility, and point out that we’d be happier and healthier with a smaller, slower world.
It simply isn’t true that we can carry on as usual and avert environmental disaster, because climate change is not the only environmental problem. Even if our technology can stave off climate change, overconsumption is still responsible for species extinctions, fresh water shortages, pollution and deforestation.
We’ve lost a fifth of the Amazon since 197o. There is a trash island the size of the continental United States in the Pacific Ocean. There will be no edible fish in the sea by 2048. The IUCN estimates that are currently endangered. All told, we are overshooting the earth’s capacity by 30%.
Honestly, can we really go on consuming?